Bebop demo

soloscribe transcription audit · clip.wav · compared against the original · 01 Aug 2026, 04:02

MEDIUM CONFIDENCE

The shape of the solo is right; the details need a human. Work through the weakest bars listed below.

Listen

Play these against each other. Your ears will find the errors faster than the table below will, and the table exists mainly to tell you which bar to rewind to.

Originalwhat you gave us
Transcription, resynthesizedwhat the transcriber heard, voiced with a sampled guitar at the times it was played — not the quantized tab, and not what the numbers below measure

What was heard, what was written

piano roll of raw transcription against quantized score
Grey outlines are what the transcriber heard, in real time. Solid blocks are what was written into the tab, shaded by how confident the transcriber was about each note. Vertical lines are the beat grid as laid back onto the recording — where a solid block sits well away from its outline, quantization moved that note.

Metrics

MeasurementValueWhat it means
Note agreement, ±100 ms100.0%Of everything the transcriber heard, how much still lines up after being written onto a musical grid. This is the headline number: how much of the playing survived being written down.
Note agreement, ±50 ms98.2%The same test with a stricter stopwatch. A big drop from the ±100 ms figure means the notes are right but the rhythm is written a little loose.
Precision, ±50 ms98.2%Of the notes written in the tab, how many correspond to something actually played. Low means the tab has notes the recording doesn't.
Recall, ±50 ms98.2%Of the notes actually played, how many made it into the tab. Low means notes are missing.
Harmonic alignment cost0.091How different the resynthesis sounds from the recording, pitch-class by pitch-class. 0 is identical. Above ~0.45 usually means wrong notes rather than wrong rhythm.
Worst timing drift0.88 sThe furthest the resynthesis had to be shifted to line up with the recording. Small means the tab follows the take; a large number means it slips out of time somewhere.
Typical timing drift0.05 sThe same measurement taken across the whole solo rather than at its worst point. If this is small and the figure above is large, the problem is one spot, not the whole transcription.
Onset coverage88.3%Share of the pick attacks audible in the recording that have a note within 80 ms in the tab. Low means the tab is missing notes you can hear.
Onset spuriousness5.4%Share of notes in the tab with no audible attack anywhere near them. High means the tab is inventing notes. (Some of this is normal: tied and legato notes have no fresh attack to detect.)

Bar by bar

Timing error is how far the played notes had to move to land on the grid, averaged over the bar. A bar with high error and low confidence is where to start editing.

BarNotesMean confidenceTiming error (RMS) 
180.9133.4 ms
290.9031.0 ms
330.9132.2 ms
490.9033.3 ms
580.9134.3 ms
690.9033.6 ms
750.8935.6 ms
850.9035.4 ms
90no notes written

Caveats